Hardware Description Languages: Behavioral and Structural Modeling

Blog

October 9, 2024·

In the world of digital design and electronic engineering, Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) play a crucial role in describing and simulating complex digital systems. Two fundamental approaches to modeling digital circuits in HDLs are behavioral modeling and structural modeling. In this blog post, we’ll explore these two modeling techniques, their characteristics, advantages, and use cases, with a focus on their implementation in popular HDLs like Verilog and VHDL.

Understanding Modeling in HDLs

Before we dive into the specifics of behavioral and structural modeling, it’s important to understand what we mean by “modeling” in the context of HDLs. In essence, modeling refers to the process of describing a digital system or circuit in a way that can be simulated, synthesized, or used to generate actual hardware.

HDLs allow designers to work at various levels of abstraction, from high-level system descriptions down to gate-level implementations. The choice between behavioral and structural modeling often depends on the level of abstraction required and the specific design goals.

Behavioral Modeling

Behavioral modeling, as the name suggests, focuses on describing the behavior or functionality of a digital system without explicitly specifying its internal structure. This approach is typically used for high-level design and is particularly useful in the early stages of the design process.

Characteristics of Behavioral Modeling

Abstract : It doesn’t necessarily correspond to actual hardware structure.

Concise : Complex functionality can often be described more concisely than with structural models.

Easier to Understand : For complex systems, behavioral models can be easier to read and understand.

Example in Verilog

Let’s consider a simple example of a 4-bit counter implemented using behavioral modeling in Verilog:

module counter_4bit(
    input clk,
    input reset,
    output reg [3:0] count
);

always @(posedge clk or posedge reset) begin
    if (reset)
        count <= 4'b0000;
    else
        count <= count + 1;
end

endmodule

In this example, we describe the behavior of the counter using an always block. The counter increments on each positive edge of the clock unless reset is asserted.

Example in VHDL

Here’s the same 4-bit counter implemented in VHDL:

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL;

entity counter_4bit is
    Port ( clk : in STD_LOGIC;
           reset : in STD_LOGIC;
           count : out STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(3 downto 0));
end counter_4bit;

architecture Behavioral of counter_4bit is
    signal count_temp : STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(3 downto 0) := (others => '0');
begin
    process(clk, reset)
    begin
        if reset = '1' then
            count_temp <= (others => '0');
        elsif rising_edge(clk) then
            count_temp <= count_temp + 1;
        end if;
    end process;

    count <= count_temp;
end Behavioral;

This VHDL code describes the same behavior as the Verilog example, using a process to define the counter’s functionality.

Advantages of Behavioral Modeling

Rapid Prototyping : Quicker to write and simulate, especially for complex systems.

Flexibility : Easier to modify and experiment with different algorithms or approaches.

Readability : Often more intuitive and easier to understand, especially for non-hardware specialists.

Limitations of Behavioral Modeling

Performance : May not always result in the most efficient hardware implementation.

Control : Less direct control over the resulting hardware structure.

Structural Modeling

Structural modeling, on the other hand, describes a digital system in terms of its components and their interconnections. This approach is closer to the actual hardware implementation and is often used for lower-level designs or when specific hardware structures are required.

Characteristics of Structural Modeling

Hierarchical : Supports creation of complex systems through hierarchical composition.

Closer to Hardware : More directly represents the actual hardware structure.

Explicit Connections : Signal flow and connections between components are explicitly defined.

Example in Verilog

Let’s consider a structural model of a 4-bit ripple carry adder in Verilog:

module full_adder(
    input a, b, cin,
    output sum, cout
);
    assign sum = a ^ b ^ cin;
    assign cout = (a & b) | (cin & (a ^ b));
endmodule

module ripple_carry_adder_4bit(
    input [3:0] a, b,
    input cin,
    output [3:0] sum,
    output cout
);
    wire c1, c2, c3;

    full_adder fa0(.a(a[0]), .b(b[0]), .cin(cin), .sum(sum[0]), .cout(c1));
    full_adder fa1(.a(a[1]), .b(b[1]), .cin(c1), .sum(sum[1]), .cout(c2));
    full_adder fa2(.a(a[2]), .b(b[2]), .cin(c2), .sum(sum[2]), .cout(c3));
    full_adder fa3(.a(a[3]), .b(b[3]), .cin(c3), .sum(sum[3]), .cout(cout));

endmodule

In this example, we first define a full_adder module, and then use four instances of this module to create a 4-bit ripple carry adder. The connections between the full adders are explicitly specified.

Example in VHDL

Here’s the same 4-bit ripple carry adder implemented structurally in VHDL:

library IEEE;
use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;

entity full_adder is
    Port ( a : in STD_LOGIC;
           b : in STD_LOGIC;
           cin : in STD_LOGIC;
           sum : out STD_LOGIC;
           cout : out STD_LOGIC);
end full_adder;

architecture Behavioral of full_adder is
begin
    sum <= a xor b xor cin;
    cout <= (a and b) or (cin and (a xor b));
end Behavioral;

entity ripple_carry_adder_4bit is
    Port ( a : in STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(3 downto 0);
           b : in STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(3 downto 0);
           cin : in STD_LOGIC;
           sum : out STD_LOGIC_VECTOR(3 downto 0);
           cout : out STD_LOGIC);
end ripple_carry_adder_4bit;

architecture Structural of ripple_carry_adder_4bit is
    component full_adder
        Port ( a : in STD_LOGIC;
               b : in STD_LOGIC;
               cin : in STD_LOGIC;
               sum : out STD_LOGIC;
               cout : out STD_LOGIC);
    end component;

    signal c1, c2, c3 : STD_LOGIC;
begin
    FA0: full_adder port map(a => a(0), b => b(0), cin => cin, sum => sum(0), cout => c1);
    FA1: full_adder port map(a => a(1), b => b(1), cin => c1, sum => sum(1), cout => c2);
    FA2: full_adder port map(a => a(2), b => b(2), cin => c2, sum => sum(2), cout => c3);
    FA3: full_adder port map(a => a(3), b => b(3), cin => c3, sum => sum(3), cout => cout);
end Structural;

This VHDL code structurally describes the same 4-bit ripple carry adder, explicitly instantiating and connecting four full adder components.

Advantages of Structural Modeling

Predictable Synthesis : Generally results in more predictable synthesized hardware.

Reusability : Encourages creation of reusable components.

Fine-grained Control : Allows precise control over hardware implementation.

Limitations of Structural Modeling

Less Flexible : Changes to the design may require significant rewiring of components.

Lower Level of Abstraction : May be harder to understand the overall functionality at a glance.

Choosing Between Behavioral and Structural Modeling

The choice between behavioral and structural modeling often depends on several factors:

Level of Abstraction : High-level system descriptions often use behavioral modeling, while low-level implementations may use structural modeling.

Design Requirements : Specific performance or area constraints may necessitate structural modeling for fine-grained control.

Reusability : If creating reusable components is a priority, structural modeling may be preferred.

Synthesis Tools : Some synthesis tools may handle behavioral models better than others, influencing the choice of modeling style.

Design Complexity : Very complex systems may be easier to describe behaviorally, while simpler systems or specific components may be better described structurally.

Mixed Modeling Approaches

In practice, many designs use a combination of behavioral and structural modeling. This mixed approach allows designers to leverage the strengths of both techniques. For example, a system might be described structurally at the top level, with individual components described behaviorally.

Conclusion

Behavioral and structural modeling are two fundamental approaches in hardware description languages, each with its own strengths and use cases. Behavioral modeling offers abstraction and ease of design, making it ideal for high-level descriptions and rapid prototyping. Structural modeling provides fine-grained control and a close correspondence to hardware, making it suitable for optimized, low-level designs.

As a digital designer, mastering both techniques allows you to choose the most appropriate approach for each part of your design. By understanding the trade-offs between behavioral and structural modeling, you can create more efficient, readable, and maintainable hardware descriptions.

Whether you’re working on a simple component or a complex system-on-chip, the choice between behavioral and structural modeling – or a combination of both – will play a crucial role in your design process. As you gain experience, you’ll develop an intuition for when to use each approach, ultimately leading to more effective and efficient digital designs.

Last updated on October 9, 2024

Hardware Description Languages: RTL (Register Transfer Level) Design Digital Signal Processing Basics: Sampling and Quantization